Internet Archive's in-browser video "theater" requires JavaScript to be enabled. It appears your browser does not have it turned on. Please see your browser settings for this feature.

play8?>>

David Attenborough

by: BBC David Attenborough

Publication date: 2019-11-07

Topics: David Attenborough

Language: English

David Attenborough series of of nature and wild life

Addeddate: 2019-11-07 04:56:38

Color: color

Identifier: bbcdavidattenborough

Sound: sound

Year: 2019

plus-circle Add Review

comment
Reviews

Reviewer: VideoLuna - - April 2, 2023
Subject: Great documentaries. Rubbish comments.

Great documentaries, thanks for uploading!

The conspiracy guy is undoubtedly talking rubbish but the Marxist Monkey is even more remarkable with its will to report and persecute anyone thinking differently. Which is far worse and mean than any conspiracy theoretizing.
That's what Marxism truly is, so a very correct comparison to Stalin below.

Reviewer: Brz1989 - - July 2, 2022
Subject: StinkyTaco Wtf lol

While I do agree about that cgi should not be used in nature docs, review was ridiculous lol. I know everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but why is that opinion needed here? David Attenborough, "The Narrator" is world renowned and one of, if not the best Natural History Documentarian ever. Pre-2010 he never brought up the subject of Climate Change/Global Warming and Humanaty's role in it. He's said in interviews that he didnt believe Humans had anything to do with it or that it was a problem until became undeniable to him. And now, he's trying to make people more aware. And about the sahara being forest at one time... Just do some research or use common sense. The context of that being said was that Macaques were in forests in Northern Africa. Where did they come from? South, because north of nothern Africa is Europe and no macaques or really any monkeys live there. Could they have crossed the Sahara? No, they need water. So, there must have been something else there in the past. Macaques dont usually live on savannahs, so they must have come from a forest that was once where the Sahara is now. As the desert grew, they were forced farther and farther north. Now they're stuck there. Just think for a second before you type.
I dont know much about what else the BBC does besides David Attenborough's Docs, so, I can't argue about other things. I can, however say that StinkyTaco is annoying and tell he or she to take that that annoying BS somewhere else where people want to debate with you. I just want to watch a nature documentary.
This is definitely a very good collection and Ive ejnoyed watching it.

Reviewer: Theater of Hums - - May 23, 2022
Subject: Reply to Monkey below:

"Their entire comment is literally just a string of conspiracy theories. I clicked on their profile, and its filled with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, anti-vaccine conspiracy theories, and all sorts of unhinged crap. This dude is straight up crazy, and frankly, there should be a way to report this kind of activity."

So, basically you're against freedom of speech.
What a coincidence! So was Stalin.

Reviewer: Supercoolmonkeyguy - - October 4, 2021
Subject: About that post below me

Great videos, keep in mind that the other reply about CGI, Marxism, and anti-evolution propaganda is all nonsense. For one, the BBC has denied they have used CGI, and no one has ever been able to find proof of them using it. Also, you probably know this already, but evolution HAS been proven (No, dinosaur bones are not "made in China") and global warming is likewise another scientific fact. Also: that's not what Marxism is, lol.

Their entire comment is literally just a string of conspiracy theories. I clicked on their profile, and its filled with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, anti-vaccine conspiracy theories, and all sorts of unhinged crap. This dude is straight up crazy, and frankly, there should be a way to report this kind of activity. At the very least, reviews should have to be relevant to the freaking video being reviewed, and not tangents on your conspiracies on QAnon.

Reviewer: stinkytaco - - July 15, 2020
Subject: Really great collection thanks beware newer series cgi

Really great series, I grew up watching the older series like Life on Earth and Living Planet so they are actually relaxing to me. The one thing I would recommend is avoiding the newer series like Africa, Blue Planet 2, Planet Earth 2 etc as they use CGI effects for a so called "nature" show of "observation". Examples would be the sandstorm sequences and flooding sequences as well as even in Planet Earth 1 and Blue Planet 1 they use CGI to "enhance" the scenes with so called dozens of whales and birds, you can easily see the multiple "blowholes" all over the place etc that is not real. You can even watch in the plant shows the "how it's made" which I'm not a fan of but shows that they construct "stages" for plants to be filmed in slow motion for weeks even years then presented as a "natural" scene etc lots of tricks these people play. This is also true in the other video based things like news, major events etc of all kinds.
--Another point is the totally pseudo-scientific garbage scripts that the narrator reads. He stresses at one time that they don't understand how this living current animal does this or that, but in the next breath he confidently speaks of thousands and millions of years events like proven fact that he/they were there to witness, such a double minded confusion you could not get more. And of course his marxist-freemasonic-hint-hint, climate change garbage constantly bleated at us along with the same evolutionary garbage that is not proven and has been proved that many of the so called "bones" fossils are Chinese made or just assumed to be a creature which is just in reality many bones put together. Other orgs like Natl Geographic presents it anyways as fact, big liars. "Artists renditions" cgi photoshop are the fantasy based norm nowadays, no reality whatsoever. It's all money and pagan mind control programming folks. Also the BBC are proven pedo protectors and fake news purveyor. So I recommend the older series and the "life of/in" series pre-2000 for best REAL photography, not as much annoying intrusive music either. Just be mindful of the "story" this narrator is trying to sell with a couple of so called "real" pictures etc Another example is they show a short 2sec shot of 3-5 so called "trees" in the Sahara desert and conclude from there that there was a huge forest in the North Sahara, this could easily be just discarded or cgi placed debris and then presented as "proof". So it's sloppy in a lot of places.

107,865 Views

346 Favorites

5 Reviews