prince louis taken by his mother to mark his sixth birthday. hello, i'm sarah campbell, welcome to bbc news now, 3 hours of fast—moving news, interviews and reaction. just hours after rishi runak�*s flagship rwanda bill was passed just hours after rishi sunak�*s flagship rwanda bill was passed in the british parliament, five people — including a child — have died attempting to cross the sea from northern france to britain. these were the chaotic scenes on the beach near calais just before daybreak. the incident happened as migrants attempted to launch a boat. the french coastguard said the small, overloaded boat was carrying 110 people when it set off from wimereux, just south

of calais on tuesday morning. authorities have also been carrying out several search—and—rescue operations at sea, linked to other attempts to cross the english channel. within just a few hours of the bill going through, the bbc witnessed migrants on multiples beaches trying to get onto boats to cross the english channel. these are some of the pictures from one attemptjust after dawn. the uk border force has brought around 70 migrants to shore and a dover lifeboat has been launched after reports of another migrant boat in the channel. our correspondent andrew harding — was on the beach where a boat ran aground and left five people — including a child — dead. let's ta ke let's take a look at what he witnessed as that elevated crossing began. —— ill—fated crossing began.

that does give you a sense of what it must have been like in the early hours of this morning when those migrants were going towards that boat. a short while ago i spoke to andrew about what he witnessed on the beach. this andrew about what he witnessed on the beach. , ., , , ., ., the beach. this was before dawn, we had been waiting _ the beach. this was before dawn, we had been waiting on _ the beach. this was before dawn, we had been waiting on the _ the beach. this was before dawn, we had been waiting on the beach - the beach. this was before dawn, we had been waiting on the beach for i had been waiting on the beach for many hours overnight anticipating there might be migrants trying to get to see in that area on that beach, and suddenly we heard a noise. it was the police shouting that they had spotted the migrants and we ran with the police and so about hundreds, perhaps more than 100 migrants running across the beach. the tide had just gone out, they had several hundred metres to run it the sea, they were dragging an inflatable and as the police got closer, a fight began as the smugglers of the migrants started

bringing out sticks and rods and essentially forming a protective coating around the migrants to allow them to continue advancing towards them to continue advancing towards the sea to take their boat into the water. they were throwing firecrackers as well. there were explosions and smoke, the police seemed unable to do anything. they said they didn't want to interfere, that was children there, it was too dangerous and the migrants were already in the water. what happened then was they got into a boat and we saw it drift slowly, just a few yards off the shore, some people failed to get onto the boat, failed to clamber into it and came back to shore and walked away. but we could very quickly tell there was trouble going on in the boat itself, there were just far too many people trying to squeeze inside this inflatable only and you could see people standing in

the middle, and what we since learnt is we were seeing people are certainly being trampled to death. we have heard reports some people may have drowned, that is not clear. we saw some life jackets in the water. we heard some cries. at that time it was not clear to us what was happening, it felt likejust time it was not clear to us what was happening, it felt like just a melee of people trying to fight for a spot on the inflatable. and the boat drifted a bit further out to sea, at which point the police and the migrants who had not made on the board the boat started to walk back up board the boat started to walk back up the beach towards the car park and their vehicles. we could see some small rescue boats from a much bigger french rescue ship starting to approach the boat, but at that point we still had no sense anyone was injured. we assumed they were simply trying to offer help, about to push the boat back to shore

because the boat was not under power. it was installed and drifting. power. it was installed and driftinu. ~ ., , ., ., drifting. we got this reaction to the deaths _ drifting. we got this reaction to the deaths in _ drifting. we got this reaction to the deaths in the _ drifting. we got this reaction to the deaths in the channel - drifting. we got this reaction to the deaths in the channel from | the deaths in the channel from robert buckland. fix, the deaths in the channel from robert buckland.— the deaths in the channel from robert buckland. �* . ., , robert buckland. a dreadful tragedy and the result _ robert buckland. a dreadful tragedy and the result of— robert buckland. a dreadful tragedy and the result of the _ robert buckland. a dreadful tragedy and the result of the cynical - and the result of the cynical exploitation of people's lives and aspirations by those who seek to profit _ aspirations by those who seek to profit from this misery. there is a humanitarian and moral case to stop the boats. _ humanitarian and moral case to stop the boats. it — humanitarian and moral case to stop the boats, it is notjust about sounding _ the boats, it is notjust about sounding tough on immigration, it is about— sounding tough on immigration, it is about stopping a vicious trade and saving _ about stopping a vicious trade and saving lives. 50 about stopping a vicious trade and saving lives-_ about stopping a vicious trade and saving lives-— saving lives. so you support the bill but not _ saving lives. so you support the bill but not all _ saving lives. so you support the bill but not all of _ saving lives. so you support the bill but not all of the _ saving lives. so you support the bill but not all of the bill, - saving lives. so you support the bill but not all of the bill, you i bill but not all of the bill, you are backing some of the amendments. what are the issues you think there are with the situation as it stands? i think the bill is a radical approach to try and deal with what happened — approach to try and deal with what happened in the supreme court last year, _ happened in the supreme court last year. we _ happened in the supreme court last year, we are in essence the court

said there — year, we are in essence the court said there was a problem, that peopie — said there was a problem, that people could be sent back to their country— people could be sent back to their country of— people could be sent back to their country of origin from reminder. i think— country of origin from reminder. i think a _ country of origin from reminder. i think a lot — country of origin from reminder. i think a lot has happened since then, there _ think a lot has happened since then, there is— think a lot has happened since then, there is no— think a lot has happened since then, there is no treaty that the british government have agreed with rwanda, which i _ government have agreed with rwanda, which i think commits a reminder to a lot of— which i think commits a reminder to a lot of changes that should stop that risk, — a lot of changes that should stop that risk, and i think answers the points— that risk, and i think answers the points that — that risk, and i think answers the points that are being raised today about _ points that are being raised today about alleged breaches of international law. i think it was the duty— international law. i think it was the duty of parliamentarians like me to give _ the duty of parliamentarians like me to give this — the duty of parliamentarians like me to give this bill a good look and to make _ to give this bill a good look and to make sure — to give this bill a good look and to make sure it was in a sound place possible _ make sure it was in a sound place possible legally in order for it to work _ possible legally in order for it to work i— possible legally in order for it to work. i was concerned about making sure the _ work. i was concerned about making sure the reality on the ground in rwanda, — sure the reality on the ground in rwanda, the changes they were making as a result _ rwanda, the changes they were making as a result of the agreement, were in place _ as a result of the agreement, were in place before it redeemed or presumed rwanda was a safe country. ithink— presumed rwanda was a safe country. i think we _ presumed rwanda was a safe country. i think we aren't quite there in terms — i think we aren't quite there in terms of— i think we aren't quite there in terms of what i think the bill should — terms of what i think the bill should achieve, but the government made _ should achieve, but the government made a _ should achieve, but the government made a iot— should achieve, but the government made a lot of assurances that go a lon- made a lot of assurances that go a long way— made a lot of assurances that go a long way to — made a lot of assurances that go a long way to deal with this, and now the proof—

long way to deal with this, and now the proof of— long way to deal with this, and now the proof of the pudding is in the eating _ the proof of the pudding is in the eating. you will be aware that many peopie _ eating. you will be aware that many peopie are — eating. you will be aware that many people are still concerned that rwanda — people are still concerned that rwanda is not a safe country for peopie — rwanda is not a safe country for peopie to — rwanda is not a safe country for people to be sent to. i am, the reality— people to be sent to. i am, the reality is— people to be sent to. i am, the reality is rwanda has been the recipient — reality is rwanda has been the recipient of a lot of refugees under united _ recipient of a lot of refugees under united nations schemes. i don't united nations schemes. idon't think— united nations schemes. i don't think we — united nations schemes. i don't think we can ignore that, the court last year— think we can ignore that, the court last year it — think we can ignore that, the court last year it went through the evidence _ last year it went through the evidence very carefully, it notably said it _ evidence very carefully, it notably said it was — evidence very carefully, it notably said it was not unlawful to use a third _ said it was not unlawful to use a third country in this way, many other— third country in this way, many other european countries are looking at a similar— other european countries are looking at a similar model and therefore what _ at a similar model and therefore what we — at a similar model and therefore what we have got to make sure it works _ what we have got to make sure it works and — what we have got to make sure it works and people are safe. i think the agreement that was reached doesn't — the agreement that was reached doesn't satisfy me that there will be proper— doesn't satisfy me that there will be proper processes in place to protect— be proper processes in place to protect the rights of people in rwanda — protect the rights of people in rwanda and the risk of sending them back to _ rwanda and the risk of sending them back to their countries of origin is removed — back to their countries of origin is removed. �* , ., back to their countries of origin is removed. . , ., ., . ., back to their countries of origin is removed. . ., . ., ., removed. and you are clear and confident that _ removed. and you are clear and confident that this _ removed. and you are clear and confident that this rwanda - removed. and you are clear and l confident that this rwanda safety bill will be a deterrent to people

who have maybe fled torture and trauma, and want to get to the uk? you think this will be the deterrent? i don't think we are dealing with people who are coming illegally, people who are not coming for those reasons, who are coming for those reasons, who are coming for purely economic reasons. i for those reasons, who are coming for purely economic reasons. i think it is important _ for purely economic reasons. i think it is important that _ for purely economic reasons. i think it is important that we _ for purely economic reasons. i think it is important that we send - for purely economic reasons. i think it is important that we send a - it is important that we send a signal— it is important that we send a signal to— it is important that we send a signal to people coming to the uk that we _ signal to people coming to the uk that we are prepared to work with other— that we are prepared to work with other countries like rwanda to deal with this _ other countries like rwanda to deal with this issue and will send people there _ with this issue and will send people there it _ with this issue and will send people there it is — with this issue and will send people there. it is only part of a suite of poiicies — there. it is only part of a suite of poiicies the _ there. it is only part of a suite of policies the government has to deal with this _ policies the government has to deal with this issue. we have achieved great _ with this issue. we have achieved great success with albania in reducing _ great success with albania in reducing the number is coming from there _ reducing the number is coming from there i_ reducing the number is coming from there. i think cooperation with the french— there. i think cooperation with the french anv— there. i think cooperation with the french any form of investment and close _ french any form of investment and close working is clearly an important part of this, and today's horror— important part of this, and today's horror again brings into relief the vital importance of working with partners — vital importance of working with partners in europe. this is a problem _ partners in europe. this is a problem that affects the whole of western — problem that affects the whole of western europe, the mass migration

of peopie _ western europe, the mass migration of people away from areas of war or economic— of people away from areas of war or economic poverty. and it is up to all of— economic poverty. and it is up to all of us — economic poverty. and it is up to all of us to— economic poverty. and it is up to all of us to work together to try and deal— all of us to work together to try and deal with it. rwanda is on the part of— and deal with it. rwanda is on the part of a _ and deal with it. rwanda is on the part of a wider policy. that and deal with it. rwanda is on the part of a wider policy.— part of a wider policy. that is the former conservative _ part of a wider policy. that is the former conservative justice - former conservative justice secretary. 0ur chief political correspondent had this update from westminster. that is why this is such a huge debate in westminster and of course in the country at large is because nobody believes that situation with people making that perilous and in some cases fatal journey people making that perilous and in some cases fataljourney is an adequate state of affairs, but where people differ really quite profoundly as how to address it. it has been the policy notjust of rishi sunak but successive

conservative prime ministers for more than two years that the way to solve this problem is to have a firm deterrent that makes people not set out on that journey. deterrent that makes people not set out on thatjourney. in the view of rishi sunak that deterrent is this policy. in the view of labour, all this policy will do is soak up money without actually acting as an adequate deterrent. that is where the debate is. yesterday parliament via the conservative majority in the house of commons said they believe they want to press ahead with rwanda policy. rishi sunak believes he can get a flight off, at least one flight, but he would help many more to rwanda with an 8—10 weeks, and so are the focus now is on whether he is right and whether that plane will take off, and if that plane does and you get what he called a regular rhythm of planes taking off, does the policy work and do what rishi sunak wants it to do? is it a

deterrent to situations like today? we were given the figures that have risen sharply, more than 50,000 people are waiting to have their asylum applications looked at. in this policy, 10—12 weeks for the first like to take off, even when they do take off, what numbers are we expecting? it is they do take off, what numbers are we meeting?— they do take off, what numbers are we expecting? it is a good question to which the — we expecting? it is a good question to which the government _ we expecting? it is a good question to which the government has - we expecting? it is a good question to which the government has not i to which the government has not given us a clear answer. there has been some reporting that the rwandan capacity to take these asylum seekers is really limited. it is not just limited in the sense of where they would house these asylum seekers, though that is one element. there is a hostel that is ready for them in kigali, which we have seen lots of footage from. i have been there. and it is quite small, it is quite small compared to the volume of people making thatjourney across the channel, and then there are some

suggestions the rwandan government doesn't want too many flights to come too quickly as they get the scheme up and running. time will tell on that, but the view of the government of course is that by dent of sending at least some asylum seekers to reminder, you will stop others making the journey in small boats across the channel. by the logic of the government, the goal would be merely sending someone to rwanda should stop the problem more generally, and that is going to be one of the tests of this policy if and when those flights start to take off. ., and when those flights start to take off. . . , and when those flights start to take off. . ., , ., , ., off. that was the latest on the olitical off. that was the latest on the political developments - off. that was the latest on the political developments in - off. that was the latest on the political developments in a - off. that was the latest on the i political developments in a story, there have been lots of developments on the bill issued today and this incident in the channel where five people have been killed, including a child. i should draw your attention to the website where there is a life page running and it has all the latest lines on that developing story. 0ur correspondence are giving

details, tom symons has been reporting from france all morning talking about how they are trying to find out more details, especially about the child who has died. and they have been talking to asylum seekers who are there, telling them about this plan and asking whether it would deter them. according to our correspondent tom, he said no one said it would deter them. plenty of lines on the website. around the world and across the uk, this is bbc news.

thejudge in donald trump's criminal trial will today hear arguments that the former president has breached an order which prevents him from attacking witnesses and jurors involved in the case. mr trump denies covering up alleged hush—money payments to the porn star stormy daniels in the run—up to the 2016 presidential election. these are the pictures from inside

the court complex. we know the former president has arrived at the court complex, but he hasn't walked through that section to get to the actual court room itself. while we wait for him to do that, let's cross to outside of the court. and speak to our correspondent, nada tawfik. it is day two of the trial and the first thing is a gag order that is due to be discussed. please explain. that is right, prosecutors want to bet hearing because they say it is important to preserve the integrity of the criminal justice important to preserve the integrity of the criminaljustice system. they say donald trump has violated this limited gag order that prevents him from speaking about witnesses, jurors, prosecutors other than the district attorney himself and they say because of that, it amounts to intimidation of witnesses and

jurors. they say donald trump has called one of the witnesses michael cohen and stormy daniels, gone after them, calling michael cohen a serial perjury. they also say he courted a post by a conservative news host saying there were liberal democrats trying to get on the jury to obstruct its. they say all of this is incredibly problematic and they need to preserve the integrity of the criminaljustice system, that they should hit donald trump with financial penalties and a judge should tell him that if he doesn't stop, he could face jail time. donald trump's team is likely to repeat some of the defence that they have raised in written arguments saying he is not targeting anybody, that he is just defending himself from these attacks online. that that he isjust defending himself from these attacks online. that is the .a. from these attacks online. that is the gag order. — from these attacks online. that is the gag order, take _ from these attacks online. that is the gag order, take us _ from these attacks online. that is the gag order, take us three - from these attacks online. that is the gag order, take us three once that has happened, what else we are likely to hear in court?—

likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing _ likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will _ likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will take - likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will take a - likely to hear in court? the gag order hearing will take a chunk| likely to hear in court? the gag l order hearing will take a chunk of the morning and then we do have a limited court schedule because of passover, the court will go just until the afternoon and that is when we will see the prosecution resume questioning of david packer, and he is the publisher of the newspaper tabloid the national enquirer, and prosecutors are starting with him rather than perhaps some more controversial figures such as michael cohen or stormy daniels because he is a long term friend of donald trump and can frame this catch and kill scheme that prosecutors have introduced, where donald trump with his lawyer and david pecker in the lead up to the 2016 election had an agreement to buy up any negative stories about donald trump to protect his campaign, prosecutors say. donald trump's lawyer say it was about

protecting his family and brand and had nothing to do with the election. the jurors will hear from david pecker himself and that will give key evidence for both sides. remind us about the — key evidence for both sides. remind us about the timeline, _ key evidence for both sides. remind us about the timeline, how- key evidence for both sides. remind us about the timeline, how long - key evidence for both sides. remind us about the timeline, how long the | us about the timeline, how long the trial is due to last and if that donald trump is likely to be in court every day?— donald trump is likely to be in court every day? that is right, this is what distinguishes _ court every day? that is right, this is what distinguishes this - court every day? that is right, this is what distinguishes this criminal| is what distinguishes this criminal trial from some of the past several trials donald trump has had a new york where he was able to come in and out as he pleased. here he is a criminal defendant and required to be in court unless the judge gives him permission for any other major commitment. but we have seen that be very limited, for example later this week there are some arguments in the supreme court about presidential immunity is, that is clearly a very important hearing for donald trump's other criminal cases about election interference where he argues he has presidential immunity. thejudge

presidential immunity. the judge this presidential immunity. thejudge this case is not —— the judges saying this case is just as important. you can see how high the bar has been set for what he can miss caught for. that means he will be here for days a week several hours a day and not out on the campaign trail, so certainly his campaign trail, so certainly his campaign has tried to seize on every moment he is here in front of the cameras before he goes and out of court, in fundraising e—mails, they have tried to plan rallies on weekends or evenings here in new york. they are going to have to worry about how that strategy will effect them over the next 6—8 weeks that this trial is expected to last. we will be back to you shortly and we will keep an eye on the entrance outside the court to see when donald trump arrives in court. i also spoke to us attorney kelly hyman, who has been following the trial very closely. it's a high profile trial, but it is moving along very smoothly. so yesterday there was opening statements. and opening statements

are not evidence. that's where the state stands up and lays out the case and then where the defendant's counsel has an opportunity to say what their position is on the arguments. and so, as was stated earlier, there's going to be a hearing today on the gag order and then continuing with the witnesses on the case. what are we expecting today then? as you say, we've had the opening, we've got the gagging order that will be cleared out of the way. and what are the penalties, by the way, if donald trump continues to breach? because we have seen him talking as he goes in and he goes out of the court quite regularly. ultimately that will be up to the judge, but potentially monetary damages and potentialjail time as well. now, thejudge could also make a modification to the gag order as well and add additional stuff to it as well. but we'll have to see what the judge does on that. and then continuing on the trial

is david pecker who is testifying about the alleged conspiracy that started back in 2015. yeah. and he started to give his evidence yesterday, didn't he? so that will continue today. yes. the whole catch and release kind of idea that money was paid to catch the stories, but they were never put on the press, the national enquirer. and that allegedly back in 2015 with michael cohen and donald trump, they had a meeting and alleged this scheme to affect the election. that was the us attorney. china's weather agency has issued its highest—level rainstorm warning for the south of the country. more than 100,000 people have been evacuated from their homes in guangdong — after massive flooding in the country's most populous province. four people have died, and ten others are missing.

laura bicker has more from beijing. powerful storms across southern china turned rivers into raging torrents. roads became fast flowing rapids cascading down village streets as hail the size of golf balls fell from the sky. watch the right hand corner of the security camera. the bridge simply couldn't withstand the sheer force of the flood. the destruction became clearer in daylight, as did the number of people left stranded. some almost managed to sleep through their rescue, cradled from the worst of the rising floodwaters. but others cried for help as their streets were submerged. rescuers had to navigate their boats through a flooded urban landscape.

tens of thousands of people were evacuated across the province. several regions stayed on alert as water levels rose over the weekend, drowning dozens of crops. 61—year—old huangjing rong couldn't save his farm from being swamped. translation: it was my home. everything is gone, all the seedlings are gone. i lost over 13,000 us dollars. 0ur fields over there are all flooded. guangdong is prone to floods, but not this early in the year. weather events in china have become more intense and unpredictable due to global warming. in guangdong, the clean—up can begin. officials will continue to monitor water levels in the hope that for now the worst has passed. laura bicker, bbc news, beijing.

it is the happy birthday today for prince louis, the youngest child of the prince and princess of wales, he is six years old today. to celebrate the occasion a new photograph of louis has been released by kensington palace. it was taken by his mother who is known to be a keen photographer. both his parents have thanked well—wishers for the better messages they have received for their youngest child. prince louis, six years old today. let's take you to warsaw. you can see a podium has been set up, it is at a military base there and we are awaiting in the next few minutes or so, the arrival of the british prime minister rishi sunak, the nato secretary generaljens stoltenberg, they are due to give a press

conference in about the next 15 minutes. we will bring you that as soon as it starts. in the meantime, do stay with us here on bbc news. hello there. it was a chilly start to the day for many of us and many places will stay chilly, particularly across the east of the country. we will have more cloud. but in fact, the next few days temperatures will be below par for the time of year with the best of any sunshine out towards western areas. this arctic air has been working its way southwards across the country this week and it's going to loiter around until we get into the weekend. we start to see something a little bit warmer moving up from the south, but it'll be moving up from the south with low pressure. here's the pressure system today, high pressure to the west, lower pressure out towards the east, feeding in a lot of cloud on this northerly wind into the eastern side of the country. best the sunshine, western scotland,

northern ireland, west and wales is where we're likely to see the mid teens here, but distinctly chilly along the north sea coast. single figures i think for most, 6 to 9 celsius. similar story as we head into tonight. we hold onto the breeze across north sea coast. one or two showers here, maybe wintry over the high ground, driest and clearest further north and west. and this is where we actually have the lowest temperatures. touch of frost again across the far north of england into scotland. wednesday, similar story, not much change. we hold on to the northerly wind, brisk again along north sea coasts where there will always be more cloud or maybe the odd light shower. it'll be chilly there, best of the sunshine northern we go straight to the new york court room were former president donald trump it'sjust room were former president donald trump it's just arriving. thea;r

room were former president donald trump it'sjust arriving.— trump it's 'ust arriving. they want to rotest trump it'sjust arriving. they want to protest peacefully, _ trump it'sjust arriving. they want to protest peacefully, we - trump it'sjust arriving. they want to protest peacefully, we have - trump it's just arriving. they want i to protest peacefully, we have more police presence here than anyone has ever seen. you have very radical people wanting to rip the colleges down, the universities down and that is a shame, but the signalsjoe biden put out 50 is a shame, but the signalsjoe biden put out so bad. he is no friend of israel, that is for sure, and no friend of the arab world either. you take a look at what he said. he doesn't know what to do, he wants to take a middle ground and often times it doesn't work but it is certainly not working here. what he has done to as well as abandon them and he is trying to be as nice as he can to the other side. call it the arab world, but it is not working either. he is an incompetent man. peace will never happen with a guy like this. thank you very much.

studio: apologies for the sound quality, it is a little bit distorted but let's go straight to our correspondence who is following the trial for us in our correspondence who is following the trialfor us in new our correspondence who is following the trial for us in new york. our correspondence who is following the trialfor us in new york. donald trump rarely disappoints, giving us a bit of a sound bite before or after he is in the courtroom. take us through what he donald trump ignoring the shouted questions that are relevant to his case and instead using his brief moments where he is in front of camera before he goes into through a court where he will be listening silently all day. liisihg be listening silently all day. using that moment _ be listening silently all day. using that moment to _ be listening silently all day. using that moment to take _ be listening silently all day. using that moment to take a _ be listening silently all day. using that moment to take a hit - be listening silently all day. using that moment to take a hit at - be listening silently all day. using that moment to take a hit at his l that moment to take a hit at his opponentjoe biden and the white house, he has tried to paint him as a president who is not as pro as he

is. —— israel. making statements that has nothing to do with the trial at hand but using it as a key moment for the campaign. he is his a. moment for the campaign. he is his .a. order moment for the campaign. he is his gag order to — moment for the campaign. he is his gag order to stop — moment for the campaign. he is his gag order to stop donald _ moment for the campaign. he is his gag order to stop donald trump - gag order to stop donald trump talking about any of the witnesses or jurors talking about any of the witnesses orjurors in the case. is exactly right. prosecutors would like him are held in contempt in court and they say it is important to maintain the integrity of the criminaljustice to maintain the integrity of the criminal justice system to maintain the integrity of the criminaljustice system and that donald trump has violated the limited gag order on him that prevents him from going after witnesses, jurors, court star, that he has violated it more than ten times, they say, they say he has posted disparaging comments is about potential witnesses like stormy daniels and michael cohen, calling his former lawyer a serial perjury,

and also quotes from others that talk about an undercover liberal activists trying to get on the jury pool activists trying to get on the jury pool, so trying to amplify and the aged claims that play well with his pace —— amplify unsubstantiated claims. he is simply protecting himself from attacks, he says, so this is again another way we are seeing donald trump toasty legal system, and what with the judge say? —— test d. will he find he has done this or will he go further and warned that donald trump could face up warned that donald trump could face up to 30 days in prison if he continues to act in this way? that the cause would send the us into unprecedented territory, seeing a former president and candidate for office, for presidency, having to go to a prison cell with the secret service detail.—

to a prison cell with the secret service detail. . ., ., , .,